A reliable note beats an overall impression
The list prioritizes observations, not the severity of a mistake. A step that stands out in terms of timing comes first, because otherwise a later image comparison might show two different moments in the movement. But that does not mean every unusual foot path is caused by a rhythm problem.
For your Waltz self-check, use two playback speeds: first normal speed to understand how the movement fits together, then slow playback or still images for the selected moment. Slow motion makes details visible, but changes your impression of pauses and tempo. So don't judge the flow using only the slowed-down footage.
A useful note reads: “Familiar closed step, leading role, finish on three: In this repetition, a visible gap remains.” The correction task is to practice this finish specifically, not to revise posture, turn, and step length all at once. The actual correction belongs in the relevant exercise, not in the video review.
Keep observations and explanations separate. “The foot stays behind” may be verifiable in the clip; “I shift my weight incorrectly” is already an interpretation. So, in a later comparison, the result is “gap smaller,” “unchanged,” or “not comparable.” Different figures, roles, or obscured shoes do not provide reliable evidence of progress.




